logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2015.09.02 2015고정138
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a member of C Educational Meeting.

At around 10:30 on February 15, 2015, the Defendant assaulted the victim E (the 55 years old) and the husband F of the victim, who are present to see the vessel a week at the Chungcheong Budget Association D and C intersection D, and C intersection, from the C intersection G, that the victim’s husband F is not a member of the Korea church, and that the victim’s husband F, who is not a member of the Korean church, she she she she takes the horses, she she gets out of the church, she gets out of the victim’s left side, she gets out of the church, and she continuously gets out of the part of the victim.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the left arms and shoulder, and pressure tensions caused by the tension on the breast side, which requires about 10 days medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the video CD-related statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the claim of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserted that the defendant and his defense counsel did not exercise the physical force to the extent that the victim's arms would occur but did not exercise the physical force to the extent that the injury would occur, and that there was considerable force to the defendant, etc. who prevented the victim from entering the church again, and there was no causation between the type of injury and the injury inflicted by the defendant, and that there was no causal relation between the defendant's force and the injury inflicted upon the victim who was removed from the church, while the bracker ordered the victim's expulsion, but the victim did not comply with the order, and thereby the defendant took the victim out of the church, and therefore, it constitutes a

However, considering the degree, degree, background, and situation of the use of the tangible force recognized by the above evidence adopted and examined by this court, the defendant is the victim.

arrow