A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 16, 2017, at around 05:20, the Defendant: (a) was under diving on the back seat of D 9-K KS, which was parked on the street in front of Pyeongtaek-si B without a locking door; (b) was required to return home from F to the police officer who was called up after receiving 112 a report; and (c) was required to do so to the said F, such as “I am going to the son of this weather; (b) I am to the son of this weather; (c) I am to the son of this weather; (d) I am to the son of this weather; and (e) I am to the son of this F on one occasion at the left side part of the vehicle; and (e) am to the cam string, which was accumulated on the road surface that was loaded on the road surface.

Since then, while the defendant was coming back from the above vehicle and returned home at around 05:25 on the same day, he discovered the patrol vehicle of No. 92 operated by the police box of Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station, which was called up by the above F at the second street 7 smart Doo Doo, and was called up by the above F on the second street, and obstructed the operation of the patrol vehicle by inserting the back wheels of the patrol vehicle on the left side of the said patrol vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports by police officers and crime prevention and suppression.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. A H statement;

1. Investigation report (to have telephone conversations for witnesses);

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following favorable circumstances):

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection, etc. of Social Service Order (the scope of a recommendation) is that there is no person [special sentencing person] in the basic area (from June to January 1) (the special sentencing person] [decision of sentence] unfavorable: there is a history of being punished by a fine several times due to the same kind of crime and violence-related crime, and the injured police officers are punished against the defendant.