logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2014.11.13 2013고정656
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the operator of H, Defendant B is the employee of H, Defendant C is the spouse of Defendant C, and Defendant D is the spouse of Defendant C.

1. On June 10, 2013, Defendant A and Defendant B’s co-principaled, around 21:40 on June 10, 2013, on the grounds that C and D, the victim of the victim, before C and D, had been suspected of committing the Defendants’ influorial relationship. Defendant A and C were urged to take the head and body of C by hand, knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, kne, and knee, knee, kne, kne, and Defendant B’s head and body.

As such, the Defendants jointly inflicted injury on C, such as a spathal spathy, etc. requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and D’s spathal, etc. requiring approximately four weeks of medical treatment.

2. 피고인 C, 피고인 D의 공동범행 전항과 같은 일시 장소에서 전항과 같은 이유로 시비가 붙어, 피고인 C은 피해자인 B의 머리를 잡아 흔든 다음 손과 발로 그의 얼굴과 몸을 수회 때리고, 피고인 D은 피해자인 A의 멱살을 잡아 흔들다 밀쳐 넘어뜨린 다음 그의 옆구리를 발로 1회 걷어찼다.

As such, the Defendants jointly inflicted injury on A, such as mershion and mershion, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment, and mershion and mershion, which require approximately three weeks of treatment on B.

Summary of Evidence

Facts No. 1

1. The legal statement of the defendant C and D

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of Defendant C and D

1. On-site reports and photographs of violence incidents;

1. Second fact indicated in the letter of injury diagnosis;

1. The legal statement of the defendant A, B, and J of the witness;

1. A or B suspect examination protocol of the police officer;

1. On-site reports, photographs of violence, and table of 112 reported cases of violence;

1. A response letter to inquiries by K dental clinics;

1. Determination as to the Defendants and the defense counsel’s argument in the injury diagnosis letter

1. Defendant A, B, and the defense counsel regarding Defendant A and B’s assertion, and the above Defendants C, and C.

arrow