logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2014.11.20 2014고단1429
업무상과실치사
Text

Defendant

A In August of the Treasury, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.5 million.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a field technician who performs banking and miscellaneous works for the confirmation and packaging of E agricultural and fishing villages, Defendant B is a corporation F, and Defendant C is a actual business operator of F who completed the registration of construction business.

1. On May 7, 2014, at around 10:19, Defendant A, at the location of the Egyptive and packing construction for the Egyptive road located in the area of the rural village located in the Nanannam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Seoul, Defendant A carried out banking and miscellaneous works.

In such a case, the Defendant, who is engaged in the operation of the stoves, has a duty of care to check out the surrounding areas so that people can not have access to the fire stoves and check out the surrounding areas, and to proceed with the work.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and caused the head part of the Victim G(59 years of age) in the vicinity of the bed by getting down the bottom part of approximately 17.5 meters of 17.5 meters of scam in scam in scams with a scambling scams.

Ultimately, around 00:20 on May 8, 2014, the Defendant caused the death of the victim due to an occupational negligence, such as cerebral cerebral cerebral typosis, at the GanpoH Hospital.

2. Defendant B had been performing miscellaneous work and miscellaneous work at the time and place specified in paragraph (1). In such a case, Defendant B, who is engaged in safety management at the construction site, has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by setting up a warning board prohibiting residents from entering the construction site, etc., and by checking the safety at the work site.

Nevertheless, the defendant left the construction site without taking any measure even though he is under work A, and controls the access of residents.

arrow