beta
Text
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.
Reasons
1. A summary of the grounds for appeal by the defendant and his defense counsel (fact-finding) did not assault the parts of the E, a taxi engineer, and thereby did not inflict any injury on E even if the defendant did not assault the parts of the E, a taxi engineer.
Nevertheless, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment by finding guilty of the charged of assault and bodily injury on the ground of the testimony of E without credibility.
2. Determination
A. On July 18, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 00:10 on July 18, 2014, the summary of the facts charged in the instant case: (b) on the front side of the high-end 1 Dong-dong post office located in Ansan-si, Seoul-si, Seoul-si, the Defendant was a vision for the Defendant on the ground that the Defendant was boarding a taxi operated by the victim E along with D, and the victim was in front of the Songho-dong, which is located in the Hasan-dong, Seosan-si, Seoul-si, in order to stop the taxi and turn back the taxi, and was demanded by the victim to pay the charge from the victim while getting out of the taxi and going back the taxi to the right part of the victim, and led the victim to go back to the right part of the victim requiring treatment for about 14 days.
B. In full view of the circumstances set out in its reasoning, the lower court determined that the Defendant, at the distance close to himself/herself, driven away from his/her taxi fee, fluored his/her clothes or arms, and caused E to the right bluor, and thereby, he/she could sufficiently recognize the fact that he/she returned from his/her arms to E, thereby incurring fluoring down salt in the right bluor, and thereby, he/she could sufficiently recognize the result of the injury. In light of the location of the Defendant and E at the time of the assault, methods of assault, the degree and degree of the damage caused by assault, and the circumstances leading to the assault, the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor alone, thereby allowing the Defendant to recognize the result of the injury.