1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants exceeding the money ordered to be paid under the following subparagraphs shall be revoked.

Basic Facts

The Defendants concerned are those who have had the intention of “G Hospital” (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) in Ansan-si F, and the network H (hereinafter “the deceased”) are those who have received the diagnosis and impulse treatment at the Defendant Hospital, and the Plaintiff A’s wife, Plaintiff B, and C are the children of the Deceased.

On December 13, 2009, the Deceased, who performed the instant surgery and the organizational inspection, was transferred to the Defendant Hospital.

As a result of the blood examination and taking of clothes CT shooting against the deceased, the Defendant D conducted a diagnosis of “pactical shock infection” and taken measures to hospitalization of the deceased at the Defendant hospital, upon the confirmation of an opinion of the climatic shocker, etc. around it.

On December 14, 2009, Defendant E conducted re-testation of the body CT for the Deceased, and performed hydrocompacting surgery using the divesculing (hereinafter “instant surgery”). During the process, Defendant E recovered tissue from the body of the procedure and requested a medical corporation Green Cross on December 15, 2009 (hereinafter “green Cross”) to conduct tissue inspection (hereinafter “instant tissue inspection”).

On December 18, 2009, the Defendants did not immediately confirm the organizational path report stating the result of the organizational inspection of this case from the Green Cross, but did not immediately confirm it. The above report contains a statement that the clance of size x 0.7 cm was found in the vicinity of the shockter of the Deceased, and that the above report shows the opinion of “Aden carnoma”.

Until December 21, 2009, the deceased was discharged after receiving antibiotics and preserved treatment from the instant surgery until December 21, 2009. However, as the pains and pains continued, the deceased applied again to the Defendant Hospital on February 3, 2010.

The Defendants determined that pain was caused by the farming of the franchisium, and administered antibiotics to the Deceased, and continued to treat antibiotics on February 16, 2010 and February 22, 2010.

The Deceased shall return on February 28, 2010.