logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.11.23 2017고단1053
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the contractor of a new house construction project in Gyeonggi-gun Group B, and the victim C is the sewage level in the construction site.

피고인은 2015. 8. 초 순경 위 공사현장에서 피해자에게 “ 위 공사 현장 창호 및 샷 시 공사를 해 주면 공사대금으로 2,054만 원을 공사 진척도에 따라서 지급하겠다.

” 고 말하면서, 2015. 8. 18. 계약금 명목으로 300만 원을 지급하고 피해자로 하여금 위 창호 및 샷 시 공사를 시공하도록 하였다.

However, at that time, the Defendant received a contract amount of KRW 100 million from the contractor, but failed to properly perform the construction work by using a considerable portion of the contract amount as personal debt repayment and living expenses, etc., and was unable to pay the contract amount promised to the subcontractor other than the victim. Thus, even if the victim was to perform the construction work, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the contract amount to the victim.

그럼에도 피고인은 이에 속은 피해 자로부터 2015. 8. 25. 경부터 2015. 9. 말경까지 위 창호 및 샷 시 공사를 시공하도록 하여 공사대금 1,650만 원 상당의 재산상 이익을 취득하였다.

In this respect, the Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;

1. Any statement made to the accused in part of each protocol concerning the suspect interrogation of the police;

1. Entry of C in the suspect interrogation protocol of the police three times against the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. During the investigation report (a separate investigation document), the document attached to the investigation report (1: 1:1: 102: 106 of the investigation records); each debt confirmation (17: 132 of the investigation records); police statement protocol of D with respect to D (including the part recorded in E, 1: 157 - 167 of the investigation records; 157 - 167 of the investigation records); police statement protocol of E against E (1: 236 - 250 of the investigation records); site director’s counter telephone investigation (1: 348 of the investigation records); and household parties G.

arrow