Defendant

A and C shall be punished by a fine of 700,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 1,00,000 won.

The Defendants respectively.

Punishment of the crime

F(44 세, 남) 은 스타 코 업주, 피고인 C(41 세, 남) 은 필름 업자, 피고인 A(60 세, 남) 은 타일 업자, G(61 세, 남) 은 페인트 업자, 피고인 B(55 세, 남) 는 목수 업자, H(36 세, 남) 는 창호 및 샷 시 업자이다.

그리고 I와 J은 현장에서 샷 시 등 일을 했던 자이고, K, L, M은 목수 일을 했던 자들이며, N, O은 페인트 일을 했던 자이고, P은 창호 및 샷 시 업자가 아르바이트로 사건 당일 고용한 자이다.

Defendants are business operators who received subcontracting from R& companies under contract with the victim Q Q (63, W, and L) and worked at the construction site of the Seoyang-gu Seoyang-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Sc.

A. The Defendants, who violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint residential intrusion) attempted to exercise the right of retention three days prior to the occurrence of the instant case, as they failed to receive the construction cost from the RR company as the business operators subcontracted by the RR company did not receive the construction cost.

On November 03, 2017, around 11:45, the Defendants, in collaboration with the above I, entered the construction site in Gyeyang-gu S, Seoyang-gu, Seoul, for the reason that they exercise a right of retention, and changed the construction cost, attached a flick card called “in the exercise of a right of retention,” and infringed on the victim’s structure, such as attempting to install locks.

B. The Defendants, in collusion with the above I, interfered with the victim’s legitimate construction work by obstructing the interior of the kindergarten building by force as described in the preceding paragraph, thereby obstructing the victim’s legitimate construction work.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police to Q Q;

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants and F

1. The facts charged in this case are as follows: the remaining schedule of work payment, the detailed statement of the payment of the construction cost, the standard contract for private construction works, the record of entrance fees, field pictures, and the Kakao Stockholm messages (as acknowledged by the aforementioned evidence, ① the Ro Association history is the victim of the damage around May 2016.