logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2017.12.14 2016고단448
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and for eight months, respectively.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A, “2016 Highest 448, 2016,” recruited male and female workers who want to purchase sex through mobile phone display E, followed by allowing F and G to engage in commercial sex acts by soliciting them to engage in commercial sex acts with the above male workers, and to divide the price of commercial sex acts into two parts.

1. On September 2015, Defendant A recommended F to engage in commercial sex acts, “The Defendant F, who is engaged in commercial sex acts, was engaged in commercial sex acts, and was engaged in commercial sex acts.” The Defendant B also recommended F to engage in commercial sex acts, as above, and the F consented thereto.

On September 8, 2015, the Defendants sent out the Defendant’s cell phone flass to unspecified men only suggesting that they would remain. After finding out the nameless male on the proposal No. 201, HOO 201, previous North Gun, Gun, Gun, Gun, Gun, Gun, Gun, Gun, Gun, Gun, Gun, Gun, Gun, Gun, Gun, Gun, Gun, and Gun, Gun, Gun, Gun, Gun, and Gun, Gun, Gun, Gun, and 120,000 won of 120,000 won of her sex purchase. The Defendants obtained profits by receiving delivery of 60,000 won among

In addition, the Defendants solicited F to engage in sexual traffic over 80 times between around that time and around September 26, 2015.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. On September 2015, Defendant A: (a) around September 2015, 2015, Defendant A solicited the said G to engage in sexual traffic, referring to “a person who commits sexual traffic and a person who commits sexual traffic once every half of the money was divided into sexual traffic; and (b) Defendant B also recommended the said G to engage in sexual traffic.

Since then, around September 17, 2015, the Defendants sent out to the Defendants’ mobile phone fluor E a place where only the conditions would be proposed to the unspecified male, and then, the Defendants were the children of the So-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

arrow