Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2.7 million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
No person of the 2016 High 1925 shall issue a transaction instruction in electronic financial transactions or transfer any access medium used to secure the authenticity and accuracy of users and the transaction details.
Nevertheless, on November 2012, the Defendant opened a new bank account (Account Number C) in the name of the former branch of a new bank located in the Dong-dong Dong-dong, Daejeon, Daejeon, and opened a bank account (Account Number:C) at the former branch of the Han Bank, respectively, at the former branch of the Han Bank, and transferred the passbook, cash card, etc. to the person in whose name the account was omitted.
"2016 High Court 2268"
1. On April 2012, the Defendant had no money at present while working in the F female house located in Busan High-gu E in Busan High-ro.
In the case of having got a bridge in the manpower lawsuit, it was called that the compensation would give money to the victim's G by deceiving the victim's G, thereby getting 3.60,00 won of the property profit by getting out of the room without paying a room and getting out of the room.
2. Around June 20, 2012, the Defendant embezzled KRW 340,00,00 in total by cutting contact while receiving KRW 190,00 from the victim H and I and receiving KRW 1.50,00 from the victim I and then leaving the meeting.
Summary of Evidence
[2016 High Court Decision 1925]
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each police statement to J or K;
1. Lritten statements;
1. Application form for opening each account and details of each transaction;
1. Investigation report (Confirmation of whether payment has been suspended from accounts for committing a crime);
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to G and I
1. Articles 49(4)1 and 6(3)1 (a) of the Act on the Electronic Financial Transactions and Trade (a point of transfer of access media), Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act (a point of fraud) and Article 355(1) of the Criminal Act (a point of embezzlement) of the relevant Act on criminal facts;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;
1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Code, which increases concurrent crimes.