A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 01:50 on June 3, 2017, the victim E (F) operated in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, demanded a full refund from the victim; and (b) the victim was refused to refund the entire amount; (c) the Defendant flicked the victim’s head with flat; (d) flicking the flat; and (e) flicked the victim’s head with flat; and (e) flicked twice the back of the victim’s head by drinking.

The defendant of "2017 Highest 3475" is a company member.

On September 10, 2017, the Defendant does not account the customers who drink in the H musical room No. 2 located in Ulsan-gun G, Ulsan-gun on September 10, 2017.

"Abrecing back to home" by a police officer of the Ulsan International Police Station, who was reported 112 and called to this place, she heard the horses "brecing the drinking value", "Abrecing her money from the inner wall," and "Abrecing her money from the inner wall," and "Abrecing her abreute", while doing a brecing her the right-hand flacing bre on the right-hand flacing of J, bred by assaulting the police officer, such as preventing a crime, patrol and handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to J

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, interference with the performance of official duties in the choice of imprisonment: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment, or imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act (to the extent that the period of both crimes is aggregated);

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (referring to the part of favorable circumstances for sentencing as follows):

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for observation of protection;

1. Sentencing 1 Crimes (Obstruction of Execution of Official Duties) (Scope of Recommendation) No. 1 Crimes (Obstruction of Execution of Official Duties) (Obstruction of Execution of Official Duties and Forced Performance of Duties) in the basic area (6 months to 1 year and 6 months) [the scope of the recommended punishment] No. 2 Crimes (Assault) in the mitigation area (1 month to 8 months] in the mitigation area (1 month to 1 month), the mitigation area (a special mitigation person] in the mitigation area (1 month to 1 months) (a special mitigation person).