2015do 14853 Violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery)

officer: Acceptance of a bribe

A

Defendant

Law Firm (with limited liability) B

Attorney in charge C, D, E

Seoul High Court Decision 2015No 351 decided September 4, 2015

March 10, 2016

The appeal shall be dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are determined.

Examining the reasoning of the original judgment in light of the evidence duly adopted by the first instance court and the first instance court, the lower court’s determination that the facts of the preliminary prosecution of this case were recognized as guilty on the grounds as indicated in its judgment is justifiable. The lower court did not err by misapprehending the bounds of the free evaluation of evidence by violating the logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on bribe in the crime of receiving or receiving a bribe, intention, identity of the facts charged, or changes in indictment, or by failing to comply with the grounds.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Kwon Soon-il

[Attachment-dae]

Justices Park Poe-young

Justices Kim Shin-chul