Text
1. The Defendants shall pay each of the Plaintiffs KRW 300,000,000 and each of the above amounts to the Plaintiffs with full payment from March 1, 2011.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On November 12, 2007, A determined interest rate of KRW 1% on interest rate of KRW 300,000,000 on March 20, 2008 and KRW 300,000 on March 20, 2007 as interest rate of KRW 1% on November 25, 2007 and maturity of payment of KRW 20,000 on April 20, 2008; interest rate of KRW 12% on November 26, 2007; maturity of payment of KRW 10,000,000 on December 30, 208; interest rate of KRW 10,000 on December 17, 2007; and lending each of the instant loans (hereinafter “the instant loans”).
B. Defendant E paid to A KRW 9,00,000 for interest purpose, respectively, on December 31, 2007; January 31, 2008; February 29, 2008; April 1, 2008; and on June 2, 2008.
C. On July 21, 2008, Defendant E decided to transfer to Defendant F all the claims and obligations related to the instant hospital, including the right to operate the H Hospital located in Changwon-si G (hereinafter “instant hospital”) and the obligation to borrow the borrowed amount of KRW 900,000,000 to Defendant E (hereinafter “instant transfer contract”), and drafted a comprehensive transfer/acquisition confirmation note (a) with Defendant F, as seen above.
I, A, as a witness of the building owner and transfer transfer of the instant hospital, confirmed the above contents. D.
A accepted the acceptance of the above obligation between the Defendants through the service of a duplicate of the complaint of this case.
A filed the instant lawsuit, but died on February 4, 2012, while the instant lawsuit was pending, and I among the children of the deceased, was the same year.
4. 20. Abandonment of inheritance, the Plaintiffs, the remaining children, respectively, inherited the property of the deceased at the ratio of 1/3 shares.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence No. 2-1 to 9, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the above facts finding as to the cause of the claim, Defendant F acquired the instant loan obligations against Defendant E, and if it is not clear whether the obligation is discharged or the overlapping underwriter is discharged or not, it shall be acquired in parallel.