The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable on the grounds of appeal.

2. The judgment is recognized that the defendant repents his mistake, and that the defendant has no criminal record for the same kind of offense.

However, the crime of this case is committed by inducing the defendant to become the counterpart of the defendant's act of purchasing child F and G as the business in collusion with D, and arranging the act of purchasing child F, G and N's sex as the business of arranging the act of purchasing child's sex, and the nature of the crime is not good. Considering the period and frequency of the defendant's act of purchasing child's sex, the period and frequency of the defendant's act of purchasing child's sex, the punishment against his accomplice, the defendant's age, sex and environment, the motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.