All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant B and C1) committed a violation of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles from Sexual Abuse (hereinafter “Juvenile Protection Act”), which was held in Defendant B’s judgment (hereinafter “crime circulation table”), with the aim of punishing money or mediating the purchase of sexual intercourse with Defendant D’s demand, Defendant B conspired with the purchase of sexual intercourse with Defendant D at the H’s request, and Defendant B acted as a broker for the purchase of sexual intercourse with Defendant D’s sexual intercourse with the purchase of sexual intercourse with Defendant D. Thus, Defendant B did not intend to arrange the purchase of sexual intercourse with the intent of punishing money or the purchase of sexual intercourse with Defendant D’s sexual intercourse. Thus, Defendant B assisted the purchase of sexual intercourse with “business”.

However, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles or by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2) Defendant B and C’s assertion on the charge of violating the Juvenile Sex Protection Act (such as brokerage, etc.) in the second list of crimes committed by Defendant B and C, or on the part of 6-24 per annum in the sight table 2, Defendant B did not arrange the act of purchasing the sex of a child, such as the one of the 15-24 yearlys in the sight table 2, and Defendant C did not have arranged the act of purchasing the sex of a child, such as the one of the 2nds of the crime sight table 2. Defendant C did not arrange the act of purchasing the sex of a child.

In addition, the part 8, 17 of the year 2 of one crime sight table 2 is not equal to the number of the act of purchasing the sex of the child, so H does not correspond to the elements of the act of buying the sex of the child, and it does not constitute the elements of the act of buying the sex of the child, and H does not have to engage in sexual traffic, such as 9, 21 the year 2 of the list of crimes.

B) Even if Defendant B and C did not act as a broker to purchase sex of a child juvenile, they assisted the purchase of sex of a child juvenile, such as Defendant B and C, as in the second list of crimes committed.

Even to Defendant B and C, the purpose of profit-making and the purchase of sex by children.