1. Defendant B and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) C deliver to the Plaintiff the building indicated in the attached Form C.

2. Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) C.

1. Determination as to the claim against the defendant B

A. Grounds for a claim: A building listed in the attached list is owned by the plaintiff and lent for loan to the defendant, and sought delivery for the termination of the loan for use.

(b) Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant C

A. On October 2008, the Plaintiff is an apartment as indicated in the attached Table from the D Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

) The intermediate payment and the remainder are sold in lots, and the intermediate payment were paid in installments. Defendant B, who was an son, was married with Defendant C, around August 2010, and Defendant B was married with Defendant C, and, around 2010, No. 514 Dong 1701 (hereinafter “E apartment”).

(2) On January 2012, 2012, the Plaintiff was used to pay the remainder of the apartment in this case, which received a refund of KRW 1.5 million from the E apartment lessor on the following grounds: (a) the Plaintiff’s money, which had been prepared as the selling price of the apartment in this case, leased from the F, the owner of the apartment in this case, and had the Defendants reside in the E apartment, by paying KRW 1.5 million to the lessor; and (b) the Defendants, who resided in the E apartment, moved to the E apartment in this case.

On December 22, 2014, the registration of preservation of ownership was made on the apartment of this case in the name of the Plaintiff.

[Grounds for recognition] Evidence Nos. 1 through 9, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. Determination on the claim 1: According to the fact that the defendant's duty of delivery upon the termination of the loan for use was acknowledged, the plaintiff leased his own money and made the defendants use the apartment free of charge, and thereafter, made the defendants reside free of charge in the apartment of this case owned by the plaintiff, thereby allowing the defendants to reside free of charge in the apartment of this case owned by the plaintiff.

However, this is the case.