A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and a fine of three hundred thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

On March 22, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and three years of suspended execution by the Daegu High Court, which became final and conclusive on March 30, 2012, and is currently under the grace period.

1. Interference with business;

A. On October 8, 2014, from around 18:10 to 18:45 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim’s desire at the “E” restaurant operated by the Daegu Seo-gu Seo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “E”) to the effect that “I wish to report to the victim as to whether I want to be sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually, and to do so without permission”; and (b) obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by having the customers leave the place.

B. On October 21, 2014, from around 19:30 to 19:45 of the same day, the Defendant is expected to wait for the victim’s “H” at the main point of “H” located in Daegu Seo-gu, Seogu, Daegu where the Victim F (Nam and 22 years of age) works as an employee, until the time when the Victim F was opened to the president.

The victim's main business was interfered with by force by having the customers leave the place through a large sound, such as ‘the expression', etc.

2. On November 13, 2014, from around 13:00 to around 13:30 of the same day, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (hereinafter “Public Offices Revocation column”), the Defendant, at the J community service center located in Daegu-gu I, Daegu-gu, as well as at the J community service center, the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, called the Defendant’s duty-free K (20 years old) as a substitute for the value of his/her eating, and avoided disturbance, and the Defendant, as a public official in charge of social welfare (35 years old), made a large voice on several occasions, called “the head of Dong, Da Ma, Maak, Mawk k k k k k k k k k k k k

As a result, the Defendant, while drunk for about 30 minutes, had a very rough and disorderly speech and behavior at a public office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement about L, D, and F;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports, judgment, etc.;