logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2017.09.28 2017고단409
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle B.

On April 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven by the said Radradon car on April 28, 2017; and (b) caused injury to the victim, i.e., e., 12 weeks of pressure necessary for the treatment of the said vehicle, by taking the part of the instant vehicle’s left bridge to the left right from the right side of the instant road due to negligence when he/she neglected to perform his/her duty of care on the left side, while driving the D shooting distance from the right side of the Veterans Hall to the right side of the said road.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. E statements;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a report on actual condition survey, a field photograph, a driver's license ledger, and a written inquiry about mandatory insurance, and a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 of the same Act), such as the fact that the victim was injured due to the Defendant’s negligence, but the Defendant was divided in depth into the Defendant’s mistake, the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle is covered by a comprehensive

arrow