logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2018.04.27 2018고단293
업무상과실치사등
Text

Defendant

A In six months of imprisonment, Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 4,00,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 6 months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A Co., Ltd. is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing the main and electrical parts of the company in Haan-gun E, Ha, and Defendant A is a representative director of the company B, who is in charge of safety and health management in charge of formulating an industrial accident prevention plan and monitoring and improving the working environment. Defendant C is a worker who is in charge of capital punishment in the main team of the capital punishment in the production department of the above company.

1. The weight of sand gaug, which Defendant A and C produced and handled the main products for high voltage blocking devices in Defendant C and C, is equivalent to 2,500 km, and the weight of the main shape is equivalent to 500 km.

Defendant

A, around November 8, 2017, around 08:30, produced a light for high voltage blocking devices at the place of the above company, and caused Defendant C to transport sand softens into the place of work by using the tent strings.

In the place where the above heavy objects are handled, the business owner shall require workers to wear safety caps when carrying out an operation at the risk of sacrificing, and prepare a work plan for handling heavy objects containing safety measures to prevent the sacrific and electric shock danger, and has occupational duty to designate a work conductor and command his/her work in accordance with the work plan, and the person engaged in the work for handling heavy objects has a duty of care to ensure that the location of the sacrife’s headhead is against the center of heavy objects, and that the person engaged in the work for handling heavy objects has a duty of care to keep heavy objects from being paid.

Nevertheless, Defendant A did not have the victim F (58 taxes) who had been engaged in rhythm inside the main shape, wear a safety cap, let Defendant C transport heavy objects, and did not prepare a work plan containing safety measures, but did not designate a person who is in charge of the work.

arrow