logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 서부지원 2019.05.16 2019고단663
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive, the above sentence shall be executed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall provide for the distribution or use of a game product which has not been classified, display or keep the same for such purposes, shall exchange, arrange for exchange or repurchase the tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of the game product, or engage in speculative activities as a business by using speculative gaming machines.

The Defendants installed a game machine in Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City F, and Defendant A and G conspired to operate an illegal game room in which customers exchange the outcome acquired by a game after providing the game machine that was not rated (hereinafter “game room”) to customers, as a joint business proprietor operating an unauthorized game room (hereinafter “game room”), Defendant B, by cleaning the game room and driving the vehicle into the game room, and by burning them into the game room, Defendant C, Defendant C, the role of repairing the game machine and settling profits together with G, Defendant D, Defendant E, Defendant E, the role of viewing the network for the repair of the game machine and the management of the customers.

Accordingly, from March 13, 2019 to March 18, 2019, the Defendants provided the total sum of 28 games of “Yamato” game machine, which is a speculative machine not classified by the Game Management Committee, 3 game machine, 2 game machine, 35 game machine, and 2 game machine of “Satop” game, and 35 game machine, which have been in the above game room, to be used by customers. At each time the customers win the game once using the above game, the Defendants provided four accumulated “Notification” as a result of the game, calculated as 5,000 won per one customer to be known, and exchanged the remainder after deducting 10% of the fee in cash as a fee.

Accordingly, the Defendants did not receive a grade in collusion with G.

arrow