1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The defendant belongs to the Seoul Western District Prosecutors' Office.

1. Basic facts

A. On April 17, 2009, the Defendant merged a lot machine with a lot corporation (hereinafter “shotum”) with a lot lot corporation (hereinafter “shotum”).

Sller machine sales business appears to be the business of slurry Co., Ltd. before mergers, and the relevant parties of this case, including the plaintiff and the defendant, are referred to as slurry in a place that should be referred to as slurium.

It is a general sales agency that is supplied with slot machines and sells them.

B. On January 10, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract with the Defendant (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) with the effect that the Plaintiff purchases 4,400,000 won of the slurgic machine ( Model lsM-R280) and shall pay the sales amount in 413,930 won per 12 months’ monthly installments (hereinafter “instant sales contract”).

C. Around that time, the Defendant installed slot machines at the Plaintiff’s workplace (hereinafter “instant machinery”).

The instant machinery installed by the Defendant was supplied by the Defendant from aluminium on April 13, 2013, and the model name, manufacturing number, and manufacturing date are as follows.

The ‘LVM-280' of lsM-280 No. 7 appears to be a clerical error in the lsM-280' in the separate model name number manufacturing date slot machine lsM-280.

1st LSS082101400/0024 December 2012

D. The Defendant received a notarial deed as stated in the purport of the claim against the above installment payment claim (the notarial deed against promissory notes with the face value of KRW 5,280,000,000; hereinafter “instant notarial deed”).

E. On November 13, 2014, the Defendant filed an application for compulsory execution against the notarial movables owned by the Plaintiff with the Daegu District Court 2014No. 4494 with the title of execution of the instant notarial deed as the title of execution, and completed the seizure execution.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 3, 6 evidence, Eul 2 and 9 evidence, Eul 4 video and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The instant machinery installed by the Defendant claiming the Plaintiff is the slur of the new lsM-R280 model set forth in the instant sales contract.