logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2000. 10. 13. 선고 2000도3346 판결
[음반·비디오물및게임물에관한법률위반·음란물건판매][공2000.12.1.(119),2370]
Main Issues

The meaning of obscene material, whether it constitutes a female self-defense organization or protruding Con, and whether it constitutes obscene material (negative)

Summary of Judgment

The obscene material refers to a material that stimulates, plays, or satisfies a sexual desire, and that is contrary to the concept of good sexual morality and that harms the normal sense of sexual shame of the general public. Thus, in the case of women's self-concept or protruding-con, even if the material itself is exempted from giving a man's sexual organ, it cannot be viewed as an material that stimulates, plays, or satisfy a man's sexual organ, and it cannot be viewed as an obscene material because it does not violate the concept of good sexual morality and thus, it cannot be viewed as an obscene material.

Reference Cases

Supreme Court Decision 87Do2331 Decided December 22, 1987 (Gong1988, 386) Supreme Court Decision 94Do2413 Decided June 16, 1995 (Gong1995Ha, 2673)

Defendant

Defendant

Appellant

Prosecutor

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul District Court Decision 2000No3877 delivered on June 29, 2000

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The obscene material refers to a material that stimulates, plays, or satisfies a sexual desire, and that is contrary to the concept of good sexual morality and that would prejudice the normal sense of sexual shame of the general public (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 87Do2331, Dec. 22, 1987; 98Do1536, Feb. 24, 199). In the case of protruding or protruding mixed, the media itself cannot be viewed as a material that stimulates sexual humiliation, causes interest, or satisfaction, and thus, it cannot be viewed as an obscene material, as it does not violate the concept of good sexual morality, since it cannot be viewed as an obscene material.

The judgment of the court below to the same purport is just, and there is no error of law as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Son Ji-yol (Presiding Justice)

arrow
심급 사건
-서울지방법원 2000.6.29.선고 2000노3877