beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, for one year, and for eight months, for each of the defendants C.
Seized evidence 1.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A (hereinafter “U”) is the vice head of the Transfer Lease Team in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government. Defendant A (hereinafter “Defendant A”) constructed social infrastructure such as schools (SOC) with funds from the private sector from “V schools and three schools,” which was ordered by the Second Office of Education of Gyeonggi-do to construct “V schools and four schools,” and the ownership after completion is transferred to the government, but the Government is in charge of the above U in relation to the public project implementation method that allows a private business operator to collect the investment cost by paying the rent for the rent. In relation to the new construction of the above V schools and the new construction of the said V schools and the new construction of the said V schools and the new construction of the “three schools, other than W schools,” the above U in charge of the selection of the vice head of the transfer project team through a special purpose corporation established by the second Office of Education of Gyeonggi-do.
The Defendant, as the head of the above U-transfer project team, violated his duties, despite the occupational duties of fair selection of a company with the care of a good manager in the selection of a sub-lease supplier. On September 10, 2008, the Defendant entered into a contract for the supply of equipment and supplies for three inter-transfer-lease projects other than V schools at the above U-transfer-lease office. On October 1, 2008, the Defendant entered into a contract with the above state Z on the service contract for the supply of equipment and supplies for four-transfer-lease projects other than WA with the above Z on the condition that part of the contract amount would be refunded as rebates. On May 1, 2009, the Defendant received KRW 80,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won from the employee A's employee A's first parking lot near AB apartment near the above AB apartment.
B. On August 2009, the Defendant, at the place specified in the preceding paragraph, designated the Z as the supplier of the intersection, in violation of his duties as the representative of the subcontractor, such as in the preceding paragraph.