1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant School Foundation B (hereinafter “Defendant Corporation”) is a legal entity that operates the “E Hospital” (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) in Busan Shipping Daegu D, and the Defendant C is the chronic surgery of the Defendant Hospital. From March 9, 2014 to September 25, 2014, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital and was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital twice from the Defendant C.

B. On March 9, 2014, the Plaintiff applied to the Defendant Hospital’s surgery on the ground of the pedestrian and urology caused by urology and urology, and the medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital confirmed the Plaintiff’s diverosis in flurology through the vertebrate test, etc. on the same day, and hospitalized the Plaintiff at the Defendant Hospital, and on March 11, 2014, two days thereafter, Defendant C performed the instant urine surgery (hereinafter “instant primary surgery”).

C. On March 16, 2014, the Plaintiff did not suffer from a decline in the strength of both sides of the Plaintiff on the same day, the medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital conducted a large number of RI inspection on the Plaintiff on the same day, and upon the observation of the increase in the blood species in the large number, the Defendant C completed the instant secondary operation to remove the blood species and to control the blood pressure (hereinafter “the instant secondary operation”).

At the time of the second surgery, Defendant C conducted a blood transfusion test to find out the cause of the blood transfusion, but the cause of the blood transfusion was not identified.

E. At present, the Plaintiff’s psychotropic state aggravated compared to the instant first surgery or the instant second surgery, and in particular, the Plaintiff suffers from difficulties in daily life due to the symptoms of the pedestrian disability and the symptoms of urine urology and urine urology caused by both sides of the instant surgery.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 8 (including each number, if any) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion (i.e., Defendant C).