beta
Text
1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.
Of the instant litigation, KRW 37,659,500 among the instant litigation and its related thereto on February 2, 2013.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, including the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, as well as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, as stated in the separate sheet No. 2, but excluding the remaining separate sheet No. 4. conclusion). Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. 6 pages No. 1 of the amended part No. 2. 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the separate sheet
7 The following shall be added between the 7th parallel and the 4th parallel:
(3) On October 21, 201, the Korea Electric Power Corporation issued a seizure order of 252,296,600 won among the liquidation money collected by the Plaintiff against the Defendant on the basis of the claim such as the judgment amount in the Incheon District Court case No. 2009Kahap8471 against the Plaintiff on October 21, 201. On October 13, 201, the Defendant, a third debtor, was served with a written notice of the decision on October 26, 201. (4) The Gosan Engineering Co., Ltd. received a seizure order of 372,660,000 won among the liquidation money collected by the Plaintiff against the Defendant on the basis of the claim for service charges, etc. against the Plaintiff on January 13, 2012. The Defendant, a third debtor, received a provisional seizure order of 200,3041 from the Incheon District Court Decision No. 2012Kadan3041, Dec. 19, 2012.
In the front of the 7th parallel and 5th parallel "(hereinafter referred to as "the 7th parallel and 5th parallel(s)") the defendant's intervenor was appointed as bankruptcy trustee, respectively.
7 The following is added: “Korea Savings Bank and the Gyeonggi Savings Bank have been delegated by the Plaintiff with the authority to notify the assignment of claims.”
7 The following shall be added between 12 parallels and 13 parallels:
【7 A Q seizes claims against the Plaintiff based on the executory exemplification of a notarial deed No. 1394, 2012, which the Plaintiff possessed against the Defendant by a notary public, for the amount of KRW 37,659,50 and KRW 17,105,90.