1. All appeals filed against the Plaintiffs by Defendant Gangwon-do and Gangwon-do Paralympic Committee are dismissed.

2. The appeal costs.

1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following amendments, and thus, citing it pursuant to the main sentence of Article 42

(The fact-finding and decision of the first instance court is justifiable in view of the fact-finding and decision as well as the fact-finding results of the fact-finding conducted by the first instance court on Defendant Korea Paralympic Persons, and there are no errors as alleged in the grounds for appeal by Defendant Gangwon-do and Gangwon-do Paralympic Persons). The “Defendant E” in the first instance court is both “Defendant E co-Defendant E in the first instance court.”

In the fifth 19th 19th 5th 19th 19th 19th 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 22

5 pages 21 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be considered as “entry or video”.

The May 21th of the judgment of the first instance court is referring to the "this court" as "the first instance court."

From 7th to 7th 5th jum of the first instance judgment, the phrase “(5)” was deleted.

The 11th 7th 7th tier of the judgment of the first instance shall be "Defendant-do "ro, the Do Disabled" and the Gangwon-do Disabled Persons' Persons' Persons' Persons' Persons' Persons' Persons' Persons' Persons' Persons

The 13th page of the judgment of the first instance is referring to "entry" in the 9th page as "entry or video."

The defendant of the 13th 15th 15th 13th 15th son of the judgment of the first instance shall be "Defendant-do and the Gangwon-do Paralympic Committee".

The 17th of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be the 13th of the judgment and the 17th of the 13th of the 13th appraisal.

The 17th instance court's 14th instance court's 17th instance court's 'this court' is regarded as "the first instance court'.

The 18-18-18-21 of the judgment of the first instance is without merit.

" by striking".

The 19th 16th 2th 19th 19th 16th 2th 20th 20th 18th 20th 20th 20th 20th 20th 3th 3th 200.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and all appeals filed against the plaintiffs by the defendant Gangwon-do and the Gangwon-do Paralympic Committee are dismissed.