(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2012.06.21 2011고정2079

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2012.06.21 2011고정2079

업무상과실치상

Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding 1.5 million won;

2. 50,000 won where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 2010, the defendant entered into a contract with the victim C (the age of 52) and performed a test work with the E-Assessmenter of the victim C in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

On July 15, 2010, the Defendant: (a) had a fluent tree installed in the 1st floor of Gangnam-gu Seoul Ebrupty room, and (b) had the fluent water installed in the 1st floor of the 1st floor so as to be stably fixed on the wall surface; and (c) had the victim conduct the construction work so that the fluent water does not fall off; (d) on the part of the negligence that neglected supervision over the progress and completion of the construction work, and did not solidly fix the fluent trees due to the crupty between the wall and the wall, etc., and (e) caused the victim to suffer from the fluent of the flusium, such as the flusium flusium, which was attached to the wall in the flusium at around 30, 2010, which was attached to the wall.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement by the witness C and F (no statement is trustable that the sing of the non-quality of the non-quality of the witness C and F was extended over the joint board);

1. In the first protocol of examination of the suspect by the prosecution against the defendant, part of the statement made by C in the prosecutor's office (not reliance on the statement made by C to the effect that singcing without quality extends over the joint board);

1. Statement F in the second protocol of interrogation of the accused at the prosecution (no statement made to the effect that there was no singkes and any singkes in the F’s statement and any singkes on the wall)

1. Statement C in the second police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Of the third police interrogation protocol against the Defendant, the statement to the effect that there was no trace of singing the Defendant’s entries in G and part of C’s statements.

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 2015.05.26 2013고단9117

-서울남부지방법원 2013.10.30 2013고단2065

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.04.11 2017가단107878

-대구지방법원 2014.11.05 2014고정1297

-서울남부지방법원 2014.04.02 2013고정1459