logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.10.30 2013고단2065
횡령
Text

The defendant is innocent.

Reasons

1. On April 201, 201, the Defendant suggested that the Defendant would supply the heavy equipment parts to the Han Heavy Industries when he/she will be awarded a bid for the purchase of the equipment parts in the Han Heavy Industries, which is implemented in the Han Heavy Industries, in the office of “D” located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and to F, who is an employee of the victim (E) in the Han Heavy Industries.

Accordingly, the defendant and the victim company provided heavy equipment parts together in the Hanjin Heavy Industries, and the defendant received the payment first from Hanjin Heavy Industries, and agreed to deliver it to the victim company.

Pursuant to the above agreement, the Defendant arbitrarily consumed KRW 56,363,378 equivalent to the cost of parts supplied by the victim among the cost of parts of the equipment part among the cost of the equipment part, which was received from the Han Heavy Industries as “D” from April 30, 2011 to August 12, 2011, and embezzled it by paying the Defendant’s transaction price to the customer according to the mind at that time.

2. The facts charged are based on the premise that the defendant supplied parts to the Hanjin Heavy Industries jointly with the victim, and the cost of parts paid by the Hanjin Heavy Industries is the joint ownership of the victim and the defendant.

On the other hand, there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. The witness F's statement, which corresponds to the fact that the defendant was in a position to deliver the goods to the Han Heavy Industries jointly with the victim, and part of F's protocol of suspect interrogation of the defendant to the prosecution against the defendant (this seems to have been erroneous in the legal judgment as to the fact that the victim company delivered the goods directly to the Han Heavy Industries).

Rather, according to the witness F’s partial legal testimony, F’s accusation, and the police statement of F, the fact that only D in the Defendant’s management is entitled to participate in the bidding of the Han Jin Heavy Industries as a collaborative company of the Han Jin Heavy Industries, and the Defendant is awarded a successful bid for the supply of heavy equipment parts from Han Jin Heavy Industries.

arrow