A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 27, 2017, at around 02:20, the Defendant damaged the victim C’s “D” of the Defendant’s operation in Suwon-si C, Suwon-si, which was located in Suwon-si B, by cutting the victim’s market value over KRW 1,00,00,000 by generating music machines, and by hand, by cutting off the protection screen of the musical monitoring screen amounting to KRW 50,000,000.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the property owned by the victim.

2. On August 27, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s convenience store business by force by entering the victim FF convenience store in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, with a large volume of sound, by gathering goods displayed at the display site, and exposing the entrance door, and thereby obstructing the victim’s convenience store business by force.

3. The Defendant was at the time, place, and at the convenience store location in paragraph 2, the Victim F (333) who was the owner of the victim F (the victim F (333) who was the owner of the convenience store, and the Defendant was stroked with the victim F by pushing in the wall and cutting down the victim F with his arms.

The Defendant continued to assault the Victim H (V, 21 years old), who is an employee, by leading the Defendant to the Defendant’s arms of the Victim H, and assaulting the victims I (the victim I, 24 years old), who is another customer, by plucking, plicking, and pushedping the Defendant’s arms of the Victim I.

4. Around August 27, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the above convenience store, which was reported by the non-defluence 112 and sent out after receiving a report that the non-defluence fluence fluence fluence fluence fluence fluencies K’s face was separated from the victims of assault and the Defendant, and the Defendant used the flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flus

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report processing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H, L, or K;

1. Each statement in C, F, I, M, N,O, and P;

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. A damaged photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (report on victim C telephone call);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Article 366 of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;