Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Victims B are city bus engineers belonging to C, and victims D are police officers belonging to the Daejeon Busan Police Station E-districted.

1. On July 3, 2015, around 19:30, the Defendant interfered with the business, on the ground that it is difficult for the Defendant to drive the F-city bus which was driven by the victim B to drive by the F-city bus at the bus stops located in the Seosung-gu Daejeon Pungdong bus terminal. However, as the bus of the victim B stops at the Seosung-gu Seodong Seosung-dong Pungdong hot Hot Spring Complex, the Defendant left the bus and obstructed the Defendant’s operation of the bus of the victim B by abusing his desire for about 10 minutes without responding to the continuous demand of the victim B, and by abusing his desire for about 10 minutes.

2. Definating;

A. At around 19:55 on the same day, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim slopeD, who was dispatched to the site upon receipt of the report at the same place as that of paragraph (1), to ascertain the details of the report, etc. by the victim slopeD, and who was sent to the site, and the passengers of the bus and the players of the bus in order to observe the report, etc.

B. The Defendant, as mentioned in paragraph (a), arrested a slope D as a flagrant offender and was arrested as a flagrant offender. On the same day, at around 20:00 on the same day, the Defendant was able to sit in the atmosphere of the Defendant, with witness and B, civil petitioners, and police officers, with the view of the victim slope D, and with the view of the victim slope D. The Defendant left the seat of the Daejeon District Police Station E-K, and then 7-8 on the same day. The Defendant left the seat of the said police station. In doing so, the said chief of the said police station ought to take the seat at the court of the prosecution. In addition, the Defendant publicly insulting and insulting the Defendant with the desire to read “the son.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the draft D;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the selection of fines, inclusive) concerning facts constituting an offense, and the choice of punishment (the point of interference with business and the selection of fines);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code and Article 38 of the Criminal Code among concurrent crimes.