Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 9, 2015, at around 22:30, the Defendant interfered with the business, on the ground that, under the influence of alcohol, the victim E, an employee of the said marina, who was an employee of the said marina, was unable to boom the Defendant under the influence of alcohol and was unable to do so, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s marina business by avoiding disturbance over 10 minutes by force on the part of the said employee, such as he was gambling on the marina floor on two occasions with a gambling house and taking a brupt.

2. The Defendant expressed the victim G, a police officer belonging to the Daejeon Police Station F District Unit of the Daejeon Police Station, who was called upon a report of 112 stating that the Defendant would avoid disturbance under the influence of alcohol, and expressed the victim G, who is an employee of the said E and I, and I, to the victim G, that “I am sat, slope satt satt?” The victim H expressed that “I am satt satt satt satt satt satt satt satt.” The victim H expressed to the victim “I am satt satt satt satt satt satt satt?” and publicly insulting the victims “I am satt satt satt sat satt satt s

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, I, G, and H;

1. Application of CD’s film-related statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with Business, Selection of Fine) concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 311 of the Criminal Act (Appointment of Definites and Selection of

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Regarding the offense of insult of a police officer’s assertion, the expression about the class of the police officer does not correspond to the offense of insult, and therefore, it is justifiable that the police officer first assaulted himself and herself to take a bath.

2. The phrase “new” shall be posted to the class of the police officer in charge of judgment, and only the public official of Grade 10 who was not a public official of Grade 10 shall have a feasitee