beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
Basic Facts
On June 12, 2009, the plaintiff is employed as a counselor of the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul East-gu Center and currently has served as a counseling consultant of the defendant Corporation B Center.
1. In order to pay the project cost required for the joint R&D project for the joint R&D project for the cooperative (hereinafter “the cooperative in this case”) related to the collaborative project in 2013, the government subsidies of KRW 12,00,000 were provided to the cooperative in this case, and the person in charge of checking and examining the project cost application documents submitted by the cooperative in accordance with the “13-year Guidelines for the Operation of the Collaborative Project for Small and Medium Enterprises” was required to pay the project cost if there is no error in the submission of the contract documents. However, even if the documents on the joint R&D project expenses of the cooperative in this case were not submitted, the plaintiff applied for the payment of the joint R&D project cost even if the contract was not submitted, and upon such application, the government subsidies of KRW 12,00,000 were provided to the cooperative in this case as voluntary omission of essential evidentiary documents, and
2. The Plaintiff, who is a person related to his duties, received a total of KRW 36,53,200 from the president of the instant cooperative from May 15, 2013 to October 12, 2010 via nine times from May 15, 2013 to the Plaintiff’s passbook. The Plaintiff was paid money from the company under the Plaintiff’s name to the account under C’s name, and the money paid was deposited from the account under C’s name to the account under the Plaintiff’s name.
This is for the tax evasion of a company under the name of the Corporation and obtains unfair profits by using its position as an executive officer or employee of the Corporation. Since the Plaintiff sought private benefits by using a person eligible for support related to his/her own business, it constitutes a violation of Article 3 subparag. 4 of the Service Regulations and Article 11 of the Code
C The defendant Corporation was found from December 2, 2015 to February 2, 2016, and "the plaintiff is in bad faith."
women's relationship;