logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2014.07.03 2014고단630
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On July 9, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of three million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the support of the Daejeon District Court of Daejeon on July 9, 2007, and on December 11, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daejeon District Court of Daejeon on December 11, 2008, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two months for the same kind of criminal records

【Criminal Facts】

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B1 ton cargo vehicle in violation of the Road Traffic Act (not after an accident).

On March 24, 2014, at around 21:10, the Defendant driven the said car with 0.265% alcohol concentration 0.265%, and led the front of the main apartment complex in the Asan City, an Asan City, to proceed to the front of the road of the main apartment complex in the Asan City.

A person engaged in driving duty has a duty of care to closely see the front door and to safely drive the steering gear and brakes according to the traffic situation by properly regulating the steering gear and brakes, etc. so that the accident can be prevented due to smoke.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant did not discover the victim C's DNA car that was parked on the right side of the moving direction due to negligence, and received the back part of the said car as the front part of the said cargo vehicle without discovering the victim C's DNA car that was parked on the right side of the moving direction.

For this shock, the Defendant destroyed the car to cover approximately KRW 2,023,00 of the repair cost, but failed to immediately stop the car and to take appropriate measures such as checking the state of damage.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) the Defendant driven a B1 ton truck under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.265% alcohol concentration from the road in the 1km-dong from the date and time set forth in paragraph 1 to the road in front of the black village restaurant in the same Dong from the 1km-dong.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The report on traffic accidents (the actual survey report);

arrow