A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 1, 2016, around 22:00, the Defendant did not talk about the destination while getting on a taxi in the Doksan Station in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Geumcheon-gu, for the reason that the Defendant did not properly talk about the destination. Accordingly, the taxi engineer and the taxi driver continued to take a bath while driving a taxi to the luminous Police Station in the digital name of 5, which controlled the entrance by driving the taxi to the luminous Police Station in the digital name of 5 at the time of light, and did not speak for the destination.

Do. Do." It refers to “do.” and requested assistance.

Accordingly, the defendant is a police officer of the light-name police station who has been working in the light-name police station, who has been seated in the front of the taxi by a private person B while on duty.

The destination is the destination.

An engineer does not receive money.

Han other taxies on taxi;

“At the time of solicitation, the Defendant: (a) landed from the taxi to B, “I ambling. N. N. N. police.

By doing so, he assaulted B, 3,4 times of drinking in the direction of B, and assaulted C, such as drinking 3,4 times of drinking in the direction of light police station, and when a private person in light of the light police station controls C, he was at the face of drinking once of drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the security service and the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the law of each police statement protocol to B and C

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The following circumstances are taken into account: (a) the basic area (from June to one year and four months) (no person subject to a special sentencing] (a decision subject to a sentence] is contrary to the decision subject to a sentence; and (b) there is no criminal record other than that subject to punishment for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in 194.