A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 5, 2016, the Defendant has lodged an appeal at the entrance of the five luminous Police Station, digitally, at around 02:00.

In order for the victim to be asked to stop from being able to return home from the victim B (33) who is the superintendent of the police station who is on duty at the time of serving on duty, the victim saw that "I d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. for the victim's refusal to do so, "I d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. for the victim's refusal to do so, "I d. d. d. d.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Photographs: ct video closures installed within the police station;

1. The application of laws and regulations to the investigation report (as regards the ctv analysis of the circumstances at the time):

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [the scope of recommendations] is that there is no person [the person subject to special sentencing] in the basic area (six months to one year and four months) (the person subject to special sentencing] [the sentence] of the crime of this case is not good in light of the circumstance and method, and there is no record of being punished for the crime of interference with the performance of official duties or violence on several occasions, etc.

However, in consideration of favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects it, and the conditions of the sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, the same punishment as the order shall be determined.