Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On June 22, 2012, the judgment was finalized on June 30, 2012 after being sentenced to imprisonment for one year as a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (the composition and activities of organizations, etc.) in the Jeonju District Court's military mountain support.

1. The Defendants’ co-principal committed the following acts: (a) around April 2012, Defendant A would operate the entertainment room; (b) Defendant B, who was known to the general public, was entrusted with the head of the said entertainment room and asked Defendant B to manage the entertainment room; and (c) Defendant B conspired to operate the illegal entertainment room as follows.

Defendant

A, from June 5, 2012 to June 14, 2012, from military service Si, A operated a game room with the trade name “F” in Gunsan-si E, and installed 40 game instruments called “Kakaio Papy-2” in the said entertainment room.

The above game machine is attached to the outside the title of "Kakao Papy 2" and was rated by the Game Rating Board. However, the fact was a game product modified by adding the example and smoke function to the total launching speed, unlike the contents of the rating classification by using external storage devices (USB).

Defendant

A performed a game product different from the contents of the rating classification as above so that customers who find the game play the above game, customers would raise and exchange 10% of the amount corresponding to the score obtained as a result of the game, and Defendant B, while serving as the head of the above entertainment room, had the above modified game product to customers and exchanged the score obtained as a result of the game.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to offer game products that have not been classified to customers for use and exchange the results of tangible or intangible obtained through the use of game products.

2. Defendant A, as described in the above paragraph (1), had a view to operating the entertainment room, and had a view to the police in preparation for the crackdown on the entertainment room.