Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties on August 4, 2018, at around 01:38, the Defendant: (a) exceeded and continuously took a bath at the front 8503 Dop 8503 Dop, and received 112 reports by the said apartment apartment residents, etc.; (b) on the same day, around 01:41, the police box of the Ulsan Central Police Station C police Station, and the police box of the Ulsan Central District, U.S., and asked the Defendant about personal information by asking the personal information of the Defendant; and (c) the Defendant “Nbuck buck bucks at the right side of the said D twice due to the outbreak.”
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.
2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, was arrested as a flagrant offender who obstructed police officers from performing their official duties and was on patrols, opened a wale space (welland strip) installed on the back of the strip while on the patrols, and was seated on the back of the strip, thereby damaging the said patrol vehicle to the extent of KRW 28,030,030, the repair cost of the said patrol vehicle.
Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each police statement made to D or E;
1. Application of the written estimate statutes;
1. Relevant provisions of Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of obstructing the performance of public duties), Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of obstructing the performance of public duties), each decision on fines (a point of causing damage to public goods), each decision on fines (a point of beginning a crime, a confession made by an contingent crime, a confession made against his/her family, relationship with relatives and ties, a close relation with relatives and ties, and a concern about recommitting a crime, and a fact that a deposit of KRW 500,000 for the
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;