A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 21, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the victim E (24 years old) who was passed on the street in front of the D cafeteria located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul around October 21, 2017, on the ground that the Defendant was fluoring this, and the Defendant argued that: (a) the victim was at trial due to the defect that the victim tried to report to the police; (b) the victim was walking the victim’s her her el and herbbbbbbbbbbbbbs; (c) the victim’s her chest was fluening the victim’s chest on his her part; and (d) the victim was fluening the victim’s face by drinking on

2. The Defendant insultd the victims openly by putting the victim F of the Victim’s Seodaemun Police Station affiliated with the Defendant’s Seodaemun-gu Police Station and G police officers “a bit of bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch.”

3. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the same date and time as Paragraph 1, and at the same place as that of Paragraph 1, and reported that he was assaulting by the Defendant, and 112, and was dispatched to the site, and flaps of G, who was subject to the control by G, from the police officer belonging to the H District of the Seodaemun-gu Police Station, flapsing down, and assaulted the left hand of the F.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention and investigation of crimes.

4. When the Defendant, at the same time, at the same time as paragraph 1, was arrested as a flagrant offender who was suspected of obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties, and was on board the patrol vehicle (No. 22, I amburgs), he damaged the public goods to cover KRW 726,00 of the repair cost by walking the back even with the steering gate.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E, F, and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the police officer's damaged photograph, police officer's damaged photograph, investigation report (the submission of a estimate of repair cost by I 22 at the end of the year);

1. Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence) and Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of insult) and Article 260 of the same Act concerning the facts of crime respectively.