All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the respective punishment of the lower court (a fine of 2 million won for each of the fines of 8 months, confiscation and collection, Defendant B, C, and D: imprisonment with labor for one year, and additional collection) is too unreasonable.

Defendant

A and E both appeal only on the ground of an unfair argument for sentencing, and do not specifically dispute the collection. However, even if they want to make a mistake of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles as to collection separately, in light of the relevant evidence and the legal principles of collection, the grounds and amount of each additional collection as stated in the judgment of the court below as to the above Defendants are just and there is no error of misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding

2. Determination is the first offense, Defendant A, B, and C. There are no criminal records of the suspension of the execution of the same kind of imprisonment or imprisonment, and all the Defendants are aware of the fact that the participation of the Defendants in the crime is relatively heavy, in the case of Defendant B, C, and D, and that the degree of participation in the crime is not relatively heavy, and that there is a relatively clear social relationship with the Defendants, such as the fact that Defendants A and E wanting to take the preference against the said Defendants.

However, it is necessary to strictly punish illegal game room business as a serious crime that has a great social hazard, such as promoting a speculative spirit for the general public and undermining the sound sense of work. In light of the size of each game of this case and the period of the crime, etc., the responsibility for the crime of this case is not less complicated. Defendant A and E led each of the crimes of this case as the unemployment of each illegal game of this case. In particular, Defendant E attempted to escape others from punishment on the ground of the actual business owner as the occurrence of the crime was discovered. In addition, the arguments of this case are shown in the arguments of this case, such as equity of punishment with accomplices, the Defendants’ age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and consequence, circumstances after the crime was sentenced, and whether there was change in circumstances after the sentence of the judgment below.