All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (for defendant A, 6 months of imprisonment, 2 years of suspended sentence, 200 hours of community service, 200 hours of confiscation and additional collection, 4 months of imprisonment and additional collection) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendants showed an attitude of reflecting the Defendants’ mistake, and the period of business operation of the game site of this case and business profits therefrom are neither expected nor significant, and Defendant B took part in the instant crime as an aiding and abetting offender, etc. are favorable to each of the Defendants.

However, in light of the social harm of the illegal game site and the size of the game room operated by the defendants while operating or participating in the illegal game site, the crime of this case requires strict punishment of the defendants in light of the social harm of the illegal game site and the game site operated by the defendants. In particular, the defendant B committed the crime of this case even though the criminal records, including the criminal records, have been committed several times. The defendant A has relatively recent criminal records.

Considering the above favorable or unfavorable circumstances to the Defendants, and the age, sex, environment, and all other conditions of sentencing as indicated in the instant pleadings, the lower court does not seem to be unfair because each sentence imposed by the Defendants is too unreasonable.

Therefore, each of the above arguments by the Defendants is without merit.

3. Accordingly, the defendants' appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendants' appeal of this case is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.