Each public prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant A is the chairperson of E Apartment Gbiga Association, Defendant B is the vice-chairperson of the club, Defendant C is the general director of the club, and Defendant D is the auditor of the club.

피고인들은 2013. 4. 8.경 수원시 팔달구 E아파트 관리센터 1층, 2층 및 계단 복도 벽면에 "당신들 주민들 우롱하지 마십시오. 에어로빅 강사에게 이천만원 요구한 관리소장!!! 가만두지 않겠습니다. 전기 끊은 직원 우리가 보고 있습니다.”, “이천만원 요구 관리소장이 할 말입니까 돈 장난 하지 마십시오. 그 동안의 업무처리 의심됩니다. 에어로빅 동호회 가만있지 않겠습니다.”, “금품요구 관리소장 일은 제대로 하고 있는 게 맞습니까 에어로빅에 금품요구 주민들 돈은 무사한가 강사에 2000만원 요구!!! 당신네들 하늘이 무서운지 알 길 바랍니다.” 등의 내용을 기재한 색지 19장을 부착하였다.

However, in fact, the victim F, who is in office as the head of the above apartment management office, did not demand money and valuables of KRW 20 million from the Ebbician instructor as the case.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to make a false representation in public, thereby impairing the honor of the victim.

2. We examine the judgment. The case is a crime falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act. According to the written withdrawal of a complaint filed in the trial records of this case, the victim F withdrawn the victim’s wish to punish the Defendants on July 2, 2013, which is the date of the prosecution of this case.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.