The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person who is working as the director of the Nam-gu Seoul metropolitan apartment management office.

A victim C as an auditor of the above apartment complex: (a) the amount of common electricity charges of the above apartment complex was equivalent to KRW 4.48 million on December 2, 201; (b) KRW 5.72 million on January 2, 2012; (c) KRW 1,1460,000 on February 2, 2012; (d) KRW 4.79,000 on March 2, 2012; and (e) KRW 4 million on April 2012; (c) the victim claimed two or more times on February 2, 2012; and (d) the victim was the contractor of the apartment complex; (d) around 16, 2012; (e) the victim requested a management office to refund more than KRW 600,000 on June 1, 201; and (e) the victim was not the head of the management office to request a management office to refund the amount to KRW 600,000 on July 1.

A. On August 2012, in the vicinity of the axis of the apartment management office near the apartment building management office near the date and on August 2012, the victim, “C Auditor demanded the head of the management office (D) to return money of KRW 300,000,000,000 to the head of the management office,” and, in order to return to the head of the management office, said person’s honor was damaged.

B. On October 2012, F, an apartment resident under the jurisdiction of the above apartment management office, shall be the head of C, C, and C, in the same representative C, of an underground parking lot, to the head of C, managing office of the apartment management office (D) on the ground that the portion of the common electricity fee on February 2, 2012 is 6 million won.