logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.06.11 2014나27335
공사대금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the claim extended in the trial against Defendant B and the Defendant-Counterclaim D Co., Ltd.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff and Defendant B entered into a contract for construction work between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff, on February 9, 2012, with the trade name “E”, constructing a “A-dong factory building” on three lots from Defendant B, who had operated a factory on Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and Kimpo-si (hereinafter “A-dong new construction work”).

(2) On June 8, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into an initial contract with Defendant B for the construction of the new construction of the building B at KRW 1,540,000,000 (value-added tax). On October 1, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into an additional contract with Defendant B for the construction of the new construction of the building at KRW 1,50,000,000,000. On February 9, 2012. The main construction name of the new construction: The building area of KRW 1,408: the construction period of KRW 1,50,000,000,000,000,000,000,000: KRW 1,50,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000.

2.3

arrow