logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.06.29 2015고합271
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(성매수등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 2014, the Defendant, at the “Del” located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, was engaged in sexual intercourse with the victim, with KRW 150,00 and KRW 150,00,00 to E (n, 16 years of age) known through the hard-raising c, and engaged in sexual intercourse with the victim.

2. On April 2015, the Defendant engaged in sexual traffic by giving KRW 150,00 to the above E and having sexual intercourses with the Defendant, within the said “D” patrolman.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal testimony E in part;

1. Application of statutes, such as face photographs;

1. Article 21 (1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of Sexual Traffic, concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 21 (1) of the same Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 and Article 38 (1) 2 of the Criminal Act [the aggravated punishment for concurrent crimes prescribed in the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Etc. of Arranging Sexual Traffic on April 2015 with a heavier penalty] for concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the provisional payment order is that sexual traffic is a crime that harms the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex.

The defendant purchased the victim's sex twice, and when committing the second crime, the defendant first contacted the victim through the Messenger for the purpose of sexual traffic.

However, the defendants are both recognized and reflected in all crimes, and they are the first offender who has no previous convictions, and the degree of 20 years of age was 22 years of age at the time of the crime, and the current age was 22 years of age, considering all factors of sentencing as shown in the arguments in this case, such as character and conduct, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc., and the circumstances after the crime, the punishment shall be determined as ordered

The acquittal portion

1. The summary of the facts charged committed the act of purchasing the sex of juvenile E at the time and place stated in the facts charged in the judgment.

2. The gist of the Defendant’s assertion was that he was a juvenile under the age of 19 at the time of gender purchase.

arrow