All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

1. Facts charged;

A. On February 1, 2014, the Defendant reported an article that “C” as the title “C” on the TYN online newspaper site, and that “the government subsidy granted to D, the representative director of which is the victim’s wife, has been illegally granted,” but the Defendant was submitted on February 19, 2010 for D’s application for the autonomous agricultural and forest business was submitted, and the same year.

2. 25. Deliberation by the Deliberative Council on Agriculture, Rural Community and Food Products Victims was to be selected before the victim was elected E in the election of the local council.

B. On February 9, 2014, the Defendant reported an article stating that “F” was the title “F” on the TYN online newspaper site, and the route of the budget for G confirmation and packaging projects being designed by requesting the Korea General Technology Management Office by entrusting the Korea General Technology Management Office to use “D where the denial by the victims of the victims in this region is the representative director,” and that this article reports the article stating that H is “H’s preferential treatment that is not exercising the influence by using his position.” However, on February 18, 2003, the site of the D building was eight years prior to the enforcement of the “G confirmation and packaging projects” and the victim purchased a new building on February 18, 2004 and was established by the company around 2008 and did not have any influence at all at the time on the selection of the route.

C. On February 9, 2014, the Defendant reported the article that “I” as the title “I” on the TYN online newspaper site, and in the reality that the employment difficulties of the ordinary citizens have been extremely impaired, despite the fact that the work difficulties of the ordinary citizens in the operation of the operation of the operation and the operation of the fisheries, E, a regional peculiar class, is a serious moral hazard regardless of the legitimacy.” However, the Defendant reported the article that “I” was employed as a inorganic contract position through legitimate procedures, and there was no preferential preference in the process.

On June 21, 2015, the Defendant is on the website of the online newspaper company around 21, 2015.