beta
Text
1. The defendant within 3 days from the day when this judgment became final and conclusive,
(a) a correction report in attached Form 1 shall be published on C 1, and it shall be published.
Reasons
Basic Facts
The Plaintiff was the head of the E-Center of Korea Environment Institute E-Center, and served in the G Headquarters H from July 13, 2016, and the Defendant is a media organization that publishes a “C” daily newspaper and operates the C online newspaper website (D).
On June 23, 2016, 2016, the reporters I and J affiliated with the Defendant prepared an article stating that “the Plaintiff, the head of the F Center of the Korea Environment Institute, attended the workshop held by the Korea Environment Policy Evaluation Institute, and posted it on the website C1 and C online newspapers, and published the above article (hereinafter “each article of this case”) at least eight times in total as shown in attached Table 3, from that time until June 28, 2016, and published it on the website C and C online newspapers as shown in attached Table 4. The specific contents are as shown in attached Table 4.
[Ground of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap 1 through 3, 8, 16 through 20, 32, and 36 evidence (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of the whole argument of the plaintiff's argument as to the purport of the whole argument, the defendant at each of the articles of this case reported that "the plaintiff attended the workshop held as the sponsor of the Korea Environment Policy Evaluation Institute (hereinafter referred to as "the workshop of this case") three times the statement that "the plaintiff had taken part in the workshop of this case" (hereinafter referred to as "the contents of the report of this case"), but there was no fact that the plaintiff made the above statement."
The defendant has damaged the plaintiff's reputation by making a false report as above. The defendant shall make a corrective report as shown in the attached Table 2, and the plaintiff shall be liable to pay consolation money of KRW 50,000,000 to the plaintiff and delay damages.
In determining whether a factual assertion of the legal doctrine on the determination of a claim for a corrective statement is true, not only the proof of which fact is actively existing, but also any fact.