The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, the Defendant: (a) was unable to see that C was at the time of facing E’s face or pushed the chest; (b) C was not able to take E as his hand; and (c) the Defendant only testified as a witness to memory the Defendant, when C was obstructed by E and he was satisfed by E, while E was interested.

Therefore, the defendant made a false statement.

However, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of facts charged by misunderstanding facts.

B. The sentence sentenced by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below as to the assertion of mistake of facts, the defendant appeared as a witness of the injury case against 2016Da345, 634, and stated the same as the facts charged in the court in the court. However, in the above injury case, C, despite the above testimony of the defendant in the above injury case, he was convicted of the crime that E took the face of E in his hand on the ground that he saw the defendant as a witness of other evidence, and got the chest back to E, thereby causing injury to E, and the judgment became final and conclusive after appeal and appeal by C, and the defendant testified the process of connecting Da and E in the testimony of the above injury case immediately subsequent to C, including C, etc.

The purport of the Defendant’s testimony is not that the Defendant did not witness all the processes, but that C was not able to see when E was her face, her chest or her being her chest, or her being her, in his/her hands, and the Defendant appeared to witness the almost all processes following C, and C did not have any fact of her face, her chest, or her chest, and C went to her own while she went to her after blocking E, and the Defendant was her her her her her her her her her her own.