logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.05.28 2014고단4548 (1)
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. In the case of the injured defendant and the injured party C (n, 43 years old) are the undergraduate type of each child attends the same elementary school;

Around 15:00 on March 28, 2014, the victim asked the defendant to contact with his or her children because he or she was not in contact with his or her children, and asked the defendant's contact address, but he or she did not inform the defendant of his or her contact, and thus, he or she was waiting for the defendant before the defendant's house.

At around 18:00 on the same day, the Defendant, in front of his residence in Incheon Reinforcement-gun, was able to listen to the desire of the victim due to the above reasons in front of the victim's dwelling, and was able to walk the victim's side side gate, and was able to trace the victim's head knife the victim's head knife the victim's head knife the victim's knife, and the victim was spaced for about three weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendant destroyed and damaged property at the above time and place, as seen above, the 4.50,000 won of the market price where the victim was suffering, while disputing with the victim C.

3. At around 18:20 on the same day, the Defendant received 112 reports on the dispute at the same place, and sent out, and took an inquiry from F of the police box affiliated with the Incheon Intelligent Police Station Epis, the Defendant took a bath to ask questions about the case, and took the face of F one time with the floor of hand.

At around 18:48 on the same day, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender of the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, and was transferred to the E box located in Incheon Reinforcement G G, and the head of the above F, which was near the Defendant’s lock, was bleeped with the Defendant’s head as his hand, and was shaking his head debt.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each statement of a witness C, F, and H in the fourth trial record;

1. Statement made by a witness I in the fifth protocol of the trial;

1. Statement to J police officers;

1. Photographs;

arrow