logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.11.29 2012고단4493
사기
Text

As to the crimes of Nos. 1 and 2 of the judgment of the defendant, a fine of KRW 8 million shall be imposed on the crimes of No. 3 and 4 of the judgment of the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2012 Highest 4493]

1. On May 201, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim D, while serving in a mutually influorous restaurant located in the Masan-dong in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju, and with the victim D and his branch E, the Defendant was holding that F, who is the husband of the victim, was not subject to a driver's license for five years in the next five years after being sentenced to suspended execution by the Gwangju District Court as a crime of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicle).

Accordingly, the Defendant stated that “A prosecutor who is well aware of his or her ability to conduct a luminous inspection and can destroy his or her criminal record if he or she speaks with the prosecutor and the police, so the Defendant would require funds to be borne by the prosecutor and the police.”

However, the facts did not have any intention or ability to eliminate F's criminal records while the defendant did not have any prosecutor.

As above, the Defendant makes a false statement, and from the victim on June 1, 201, 150,000 won in a park located in the Masan-dong of the Mine-gu on June 1, 201 and the same month

4. One million won at the same place, five hundred thousand won at the same place on the 17th of the same month, five hundred thousand won at the same place on the 25th of the same month, five hundred thousand won at the same place on the 25th of the

7.4. At the same place, 400,000 won was received respectively at the same place on the 23th of the same month and acquired 4.4 million won in total.

[2012 Highest 4567]

2. Around October 29, 2011, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim G calls the victim G from the boom site located in Gwangju metropolitan area to find employment for the victim G at the Gwangju District Court. On the other hand, at the present time, the Defendant called “as a head of the court within the Gwangju District Prosecutors’ Office, he would find employment immediately if he becomes the head of the court.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to employ the victims as the staff of the Gwangju District Court.

The Defendant received from the victim a total of KRW 500,000,000 from the victim as school expenses in the same day, and KRW 1.5 million in the name of school expenses in December 19 of the same year.

arrow