logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2013.11.28 2013고정459
명예훼손등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a resident living in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and the victim E is a head of the above D village.

1. On January 201, the Defendant: (a) at a regional children’s center located in Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do; (b) asked the victim E, who is a son, to doubt whether he was under suspicion of the corruption of the victim E and received the monthly rent of the local children’s center in D; and (c) asked F, who was aware of the answer to “Igreging him,” saying, “I would put the victim into the son’s door”, the Defendant made a public insult of the victim by publicly speaking in a large voice as if the victim had any corruption.

2. Around 09:30 on February 20, 2012, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts with the victim’s voice “Franchising agricultural machinery, eating, drinking, franchising, franchising, franchising, and dead,” at the place where the victim E embezzled agricultural machinery, although the victim E did not have embezzled it by selling it, and at the same time, 3 people, such as G, etc. hear.”

3. Around 14:00 on April 23, 2012, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts by openly pointing out false facts on the part of the victim’s Ha, where 5 people, such as I, were heard on the spot where the victim E did not have embezzled the agricultural machinery of the village, but 5 people, including I, were heard.

4. On June 2012, the Defendant damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts with the victim’s voice “Afroat, froat, froat, froat, froat, froat, froat, froat, and froat, froat, froat, froat, froat, froat, froat, froat at the inside froat,” even though the victim E had not embezzled the village machinery by selling it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each of E, I, G, F, L and M.

arrow